Loose lips sink ships. They should send the little patriots to argue with Tyler’s delusional parents. Though a real patriot would argue that the school SHOULD let Tyler in, to bar him is unequal treatment.
Eh. . . the point can and should be argued both ways. The fact that he has no powers or special equipment (that they know of) could be argued to mean he is woefully unprepared for the classes and dangers of the school curriculum. After all the school isn’t just a normal school, it’s special classes for people who need to be taught about their unique capabilities. If Tyler has no such capabilities his presence becomes superfluous. Still, if you’re arguing that not allowing him is exclusionary. . . the argument exists but neither side is really more ‘patriotic’.
7 thoughts on “05/24/2010”
Marie
Loose lips sink ships. They should send the little patriots to argue with Tyler’s delusional parents. Though a real patriot would argue that the school SHOULD let Tyler in, to bar him is unequal treatment.
Withdrawn
Eh. . . the point can and should be argued both ways. The fact that he has no powers or special equipment (that they know of) could be argued to mean he is woefully unprepared for the classes and dangers of the school curriculum. After all the school isn’t just a normal school, it’s special classes for people who need to be taught about their unique capabilities. If Tyler has no such capabilities his presence becomes superfluous. Still, if you’re arguing that not allowing him is exclusionary. . . the argument exists but neither side is really more ‘patriotic’.
Patreon Link